The Privacy Shield? Dead-on-arrival http://goo.gl/ObvEaC https://t.co/VeGdUQ6qTY
— $Gregory Bufithis (@GregBufithis) May 31, 2016
And you thought the political parties had nothing in common? Silly. Both agree that you deserve no privacy. https://twitter.com/faultXlines/status/737635534701527041
— $Scott Greenfield (@ScottGreenfield) May 31, 2016
RT @BillMcGev: Privacy by design & "Code is Law" = major theme in this year's #PLSC2016 papers including @paulohm @hartzog @ariezrawaldman @akmassey
— $Woodrow Hartzog (@hartzog) May 31, 2016
Laurence Tribe: FCC's broadband privacy proposal threatens speech rights http://hvrdlaw.me/vhyt300KOrt via @bcbeat
— $Harvard Law School (@Harvard_Law) May 31, 2016
RT @ArsTechnicaUK: EU-US Privacy Shield isn’t actually a shield says EU privacy chief http://arstechnica.co.uk/tech-policy/2016/05/eu-us-privacy-shield-giovanni-buttarelli-analysis/ by @Brusselsgeek
— $Ars Technica (@arstechnica) May 31, 2016
Welcome Kenneth Mortensen - 2016 Information Privacy Institute @umainelaw #cybersecurity @law_innovation
— $University of Maine School of Law (@UMaineLaw) May 31, 2016
EU-US Privacy Shield isn’t actually a shield says EU privacy chief http://arstechnica.co.uk/tech-policy/2016/05/eu-us-privacy-shield-giovanni-buttarelli-analysis/ by @Brusselsgeek
— $Ars Technica UK (@ArsTechnicaUK) May 31, 2016
Don't miss @timstarks Q&A with @RonWyden, one of Congress' leading #privacy hawks. More on Pro Cybersecurity: http://politico.pro/1TUmGhV
— $POLITICO Pro (@POLITICOPro) May 31, 2016
RT @BillMcGev: Privacy by design & "Code is Law" = major theme in this year's #PLSC2016 papers including @paulohm @hartzog @ariezrawaldman @akmassey
— $Paul Ohm (@paulohm) May 31, 2016
The latest Ediscovery and DataProtection Daily! http://paper.li/EUdiscovery/1312257398?edition_id=c4098ea0-2726-11e6-87b9-0cc47a0d164b Thanks to @ilone @AngelaAMUK #socialmedia #privacy
— $Monique Herbst Altheim (@AltheimPrivacy) May 31, 2016
Privacy by design & "Code is Law" = major theme in this year's #PLSC2016 papers including @paulohm @hartzog @ariezrawaldman @akmassey
— $William McGeveran (@BillMcGev) May 31, 2016
Getting excited for annual Privacy Law Scholars Conference late this week hosted by @DanielSolove and @hoofnagle #PLSC2106.
— $William McGeveran (@BillMcGev) May 31, 2016
Iran orders messaging apps to store data in Iran - CNET http://www.cnet.com/news/iran-orders-messaging-apps-to-store-data-in-iran/ #privacy
— $Michael Zimmer (@michaelzimmer) May 30, 2016
Court found triable issues of fact whether (1) crash victims had reasonable expectation of privacy in the interior of rescue copter, and…
— $Antone F. Johnson (@antonejohnson) May 30, 2016
Intruder "subject to liability to the other for invasion of his privacy, if the intrusion would be highly offensive to a reasonable person."
— $Antone F. Johnson (@antonejohnson) May 30, 2016
N.B.: State laws vary. CA recognizes privacy right in state const & common-law tort "intrusion into private places, conversations or matter"
— $Antone F. Johnson (@antonejohnson) May 30, 2016
Key CA case on privacy vs. 1st Am. news reporting: Shulman v. Group W Productions (1998) http://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/4th/18/200.html https://t.co/nbUSpI75rz
— $Antone F. Johnson (@antonejohnson) May 30, 2016
The Downside of the FCC’s New Internet Privacy Rules http://s.hbr.org/1X2koAn
— $Harvard Biz Review (@HarvardBiz) May 30, 2016
RT @WSJlaw: Privacy vs. Law Enforcement: Microsoft's View http://on.wsj.com/1XKGp4U
— $Derigan Silver (@derigansilver) May 30, 2016
Privacy vs. Law Enforcement: Microsoft's View http://on.wsj.com/1XKGp4U
— $WSJ Legal News (@WSJlaw) May 30, 2016
The right of publicity is the real issue in Hulk Hogan case, not right of privacy http://nyti.ms/1OWCfQw #medialaw
— $Derigan Silver (@derigansilver) May 30, 2016
Why Microsoft is suing the Feds over issues of privacy and security http://on.wsj.com/1WVuGl2
— $Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) May 30, 2016
@Penenberg @Aelkus @charlesornstein At least in CA, privacy isn't all-or-nothing; see Sanders v. ABC (1999) "expectation of limited privacy"
— $Antone F. Johnson (@antonejohnson) May 30, 2016
@antonejohnson @Aelkus Take a sting operation. Congressmen meet in hotel w FBI. Recorded taking a bribe. Expect privacy?
— $Adam L. Penenberg (@Penenberg) May 30, 2016
@Penenberg @Aelkus Exactly. Because nobody has a reasonable expectation of privacy on the Capitol steps. They do in bedroom/bath/hotel/etc.
— $Antone F. Johnson (@antonejohnson) May 30, 2016
@Penenberg @Aelkus if you want legalese: Depiction of a recognizable person in situation where they have reas. expectation of privacy.
— $Antone F. Johnson (@antonejohnson) May 30, 2016
@Penenberg @Aelkus Q: If streaming video of you having sex to millions of viewers isn't invasion of privacy, what is? Extreme case.
— $Antone F. Johnson (@antonejohnson) May 30, 2016
@Penenberg @Aelkus Republishing nonconsensual bootleg porn is outrageous, gratuitous invasion of privacy. *Reporting on it* entirely dif
— $Antone F. Johnson (@antonejohnson) May 30, 2016
RT @primrconnect: What would you do if you found your volunteer study results in a published #research paper? http://goo.gl/191RXB #privacy #resultreturn
— $Michael Zimmer (@michaelzimmer) May 30, 2016
@FBI Gets Warrantless @Email Snooping Added to Two Senate Bills http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/congress/item/23295-fbi-gets-warrantless-email-snooping-added-to-two-senate-bills #privacy #surveillance #law
— $Rebecca Herold (@PrivacyProf) May 30, 2016
The celebrity privacy case that exposes hypocrisy of Silicon Valley power brokers. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/may/28/gawker-hulk-hogan-silicon-valley-privacy-peter-thiel
— $Dave Winer (@davewiner) May 30, 2016
Crucial U.S. privacy deal won't stand up in court, says top EU adviser via @FortuneMagazine http://for.tn/25u4L5J?xid=for_tw_sh
— $Daniel J. Solove (@DanielSolove) May 30, 2016
RT @dbarthjones: #FTC Putting Disclosures to Test Mtg: Sep 15 https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/events-calendar/2016/09/putting-disclosures-test Ad claim, privacy practice disclosure test/eval https://twitter.com/adage/status/737201999381442560
— $Woodrow Hartzog (@hartzog) May 30, 2016
#FTC Putting Disclosures to Test Mtg: Sep 15 https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/events-calendar/2016/09/putting-disclosures-test Ad claim, privacy practice disclosure test/eval https://twitter.com/adage/status/737201999381442560
— $Daniel Barth-Jones (@dbarthjones) May 30, 2016
What would you do if you found your volunteer study results in a published #research paper? http://goo.gl/191RXB #privacy #resultreturn
— $PRIM&R (@primrconnect) May 30, 2016
BBCWorld: EU data watchdog rejects privacy deal http://bbc.in/1qXVjYE
— $Ali Ebrahimzadeh, Esq. (@PrometheusLaw) May 30, 2016
In the contretemps over Thiel v Gawker what gets lost is a jury declared in a unanimous verdict that Gawker invaded Hulk Hogan's privacy.
— $Adam L. Penenberg (@Penenberg) May 30, 2016
#privacy Looks like wills should start indicating wishes for use of body parts after death https://twitter.com/rrichard09/status/737343038570266624
— $Rebecca Herold (@PrivacyProf) May 30, 2016
RT @rrichard09: .@katgallow : Court orders sperm removal from deceased. #privacy #property https://kategalloway.net/2016/05/28/court-orders-sperm-removal-from-deceased/
— $Lyonette Louis-Jacques (@montserratlj) May 30, 2016
.@katgallow : Court orders sperm removal from deceased. #privacy #property https://kategalloway.net/2016/05/28/court-orders-sperm-removal-from-deceased/
— $RC Richards (@rrichard09) May 30, 2016