Legal Birds Matching "SCOTUS"
Tweets matching "SCOTUS"
RT @ReutersPolitics: SCOTUS has rejected Puerto Rico's bid to revive debt restructuring law: http://reut.rs/1Pp0ebl https://t.co/tZTSzIXPf0
— $Reuters Top News (@Reuters) June 13, 2016
Study confirms that McConnell's decision to hold open a seat on the SCOTUS so Trump can fill it is unprecedented http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/14/us/politics/obama-supreme-court-merrick-garland.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&smid=nytpolitics&smtyp=cur
— $Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser) June 13, 2016
Unclaimed Property Hunger Games: States Seek Supreme Court Review in ‘Official Check’ Dispute http://ow.ly/WQfU3019M6E #SCOTUS
— $Jennifer Schaller (@natlawreview) June 13, 2016
RT @MichelleKaske: #PuertoRico Recovery Act struck down by #SCOTUS. By @GregStohr http://bloom.bg/1ts2ElD via @bpolitics
— $Oyez (@oyez) June 13, 2016
SCOTUS has rejected Puerto Rico's bid to revive debt restructuring law: http://reut.rs/1Pp0ebl https://t.co/tZTSzIXPf0
— $Reuters Politics (@ReutersPolitics) June 13, 2016
RT @MichelleKaske: #PuertoRico Recovery Act struck down by #SCOTUS. By @GregStohr http://bloom.bg/1ts2ElD via @bpolitics
— $Greg Stohr (@GregStohr) June 13, 2016
RT @abapubliced: Landmark #SCOTUS case Miranda v. Arizona was decided 50 years ago today. Check out resources at http://www.lawday.org. #MirandaAt50
— $Mass Bar Association (@MassBar) June 13, 2016
Landmark #SCOTUS case Miranda v. Arizona was decided 50 years ago today. Check out resources at http://www.lawday.org. #MirandaAt50
— $ABA Public Education (@abapubliced) June 13, 2016
RT @tripgabriel: Garland snub is unprecedented: in 103 earlier SCOTUS vacancies, prez appointed nominee(s) & Senate advised/consented http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/14/us/politics/obama-supreme-court-merrick-garland.html
— $NYT Politics (@nytpolitics) June 13, 2016
Garland snub is unprecedented: in 103 earlier SCOTUS vacancies, prez appointed nominee(s) & Senate advised/consented http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/14/us/politics/obama-supreme-court-merrick-garland.html
— $Trip Gabriel (@tripgabriel) June 13, 2016
Legal_Times: In 8-0 reversal #SCOTUS hands #patent holders rare win http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2016/06/13/supreme-court-relaxes-rules-for-enhanced-patent-damages/ https://t.co/9usv1cqRJE
— $Ali Ebrahimzadeh, Esq. (@PrometheusLaw) June 13, 2016
#PuertoRico Recovery Act struck down by #SCOTUS. By @GregStohr http://bloom.bg/1ts2ElD via @bpolitics
— $Michelle Kaske (@MichelleKaske) June 13, 2016
[TODAY] I Declare Bankruptcy?: "Puerto Rico v. Franklin CA Tax-Free Trust" Decided http://ow.ly/iZpL301d5rV Call begins at 3p ET. #SCOTUS
— $Federalist Society (@FedSoc) June 13, 2016
Professor @d_a_sklansky on last week's #SCOTUS case Williams v. Pennsylvania and How Roles Shape Criminal Justice http://stanford.io/24M1ufU
— $Stanford Law School (@StanfordLaw) June 13, 2016
In 8-0 reversal #SCOTUS hands #patent holders rare win http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2016/06/13/supreme-court-relaxes-rules-for-enhanced-patent-damages/ https://t.co/SXer834fcM
— $National Law Journal (@TheNLJ) June 13, 2016
In 8-0 reversal #SCOTUS hands #patent holders rare win http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2016/06/13/supreme-court-relaxes-rules-for-enhanced-patent-damages/ https://t.co/EgpkjrEss7
— $NJ Law Journal (@NJLJ) June 13, 2016
In 8-0 reversal #SCOTUS hands #patent holders rare win http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2016/06/13/supreme-court-relaxes-rules-for-enhanced-patent-damages/ https://t.co/EtT95af0zB
— $Legal Intelligencer (@thelegalintel) June 13, 2016
In 8-0 reversal #SCOTUS hands #patent holders rare win http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2016/06/13/supreme-court-relaxes-rules-for-enhanced-patent-damages/ https://t.co/l5xb0lMwDL
— $The Recorder (@RecorderTweets) June 13, 2016
In 8-0 reversal #SCOTUS hands #patent holders rare win http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2016/06/13/supreme-court-relaxes-rules-for-enhanced-patent-damages/ https://t.co/uoIzu8HRsk
— $Legal Times (@Legal_Times) June 13, 2016
If you think a SCOTUS seat could hurt, imagine damage from the Dem Congress that will result from Trump nomination. https://twitter.com/taniel/status/742380845823057920
— $(((AG))) (@AG_Conservative) June 13, 2016
#SCOTUS sends two patent cases back to lower court. @ktummarello reports for Pro Tech. http://politico.pro/2350gwV
— $POLITICO Pro (@POLITICOPro) June 13, 2016
RT @mookieam: SCOTUS watch was fruitful this morning - important ruling on enhanced patent damages was handed down. Full story: http://ow.ly/z3Zs301cZM0
— $Mass Bar Association (@MassBar) June 13, 2016
RT @LIICornell: Supreme Ct. decides UNITED STATES v. BRYANT, MICHAEL. Decided 06/13/2016 http://liicr.nl/234NOgO #SCOTUS
— $Frank Mascagni III (@Frankmascagniii) June 13, 2016
49 yrs ago today, #LBJ appointed 1st #AfricanAmerican, #ThurgoodMarshall, to #SCOTUS. http://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/local/journeytojustice/2016/06/07/history-medgar-evers-assassinated-civil-rights-act-overcame-filibusters/85546432/ https://t.co/ccPKWoBYQv
— $Jerry Mitchell (@JMitchellNews) June 13, 2016
SCOTUS watch was fruitful this morning - important ruling on enhanced patent damages was handed down. Full story: http://ow.ly/z3Zs301cZM0
— $Amber McKinney (@mookieam) June 13, 2016
RT @Figarella: The good news coming from SCOTUS for PR? There are no more cases related to PR for this term, else they'd lose that one too.
— $David R Martin (@DRMartinLLC) June 13, 2016
RT @TammiMinoski: #OTD 1966: SCOTUS rules that criminal suspects must be advised of their rights. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1965/759 #Miranda https://t.co/Q2p3exOXqw
— $Oyez (@oyez) June 13, 2016
The good news coming from SCOTUS for PR? There are no more cases related to PR for this term, else they'd lose that one too.
— $Luis Figarella (@Figarella) June 13, 2016
RT @SCOTUSblog: SCOTUS 8-0 rejects Federal Circuit’s Seagate test limiting enhanced patent damages.
— $William McGeveran (@BillMcGev) June 13, 2016
While I was focused on #SCOTUS, Trump Trump'd to a new degree, even for him: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/trumps-implication-obama-was-involved-in-the-orlando-shooting/486770/?utm_source=poltw https://t.co/uWZVdijEgs
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 13, 2016
RT @patentology: Now #SCOTUS has overturned Seagate, I take it we can all go back to being paranoid about treble damages for #patent infringement again?
— $Dennis Crouch (@patentlyo) June 13, 2016
RT @ProfJessieSmith: Decided by SCOTUS OTD in 1966: Miranda v. Arizona: Police must inform suspects of their rights before questioning. http://ow.ly/ZFpS1
— $Frank Mascagni III (@Frankmascagniii) June 13, 2016
RT @charles_duan: Patent trolls now appear in a unanimous #SCOTUS opinion https://t.co/sBkKCicq00
— $James Love (@jamie_love) June 13, 2016
Decided by SCOTUS OTD in 1966: Miranda v. Arizona: Police must inform suspects of their rights before questioning. http://ow.ly/ZFpS1
— $Jessica Smith (@ProfJessieSmith) June 13, 2016
#SCOTUS in Halo keeps willfulness but makes it a standard rather than a rule, subject to district court discretion. http://assets.law360news.com/0763000/763570/14-1513_db8e.pdf
— $Mark Lemley (@marklemley) June 13, 2016
#SCOTUS rejects 20-state (including Texas) challenge to Obama administration air pollution rules. http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/283243-supreme-court-rejects-new-challenge-to-obama-air-pollution-rule#.V17GWzxnjH0.twitter
— $Justice Don Willett (@JusticeWillett) June 13, 2016
SCOTUS Franklin opinion may serve as counterweight for ideological spin. Puerto Rico is a "State" for purposes of bankruptcy law preemption.
— $David R Martin (@DRMartinLLC) June 13, 2016
#SCOTUS stats: 16 decisons left; 3 scheduled" non-argument days (6/16, 6/20 & 6/27), and surely 2-3 more. Looks like they'll finish on time.
— $Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) June 13, 2016
I strike out again on SCOTUS tea-leave reading.
— $David R Martin (@DRMartinLLC) June 13, 2016
RT @LIICornell: Supreme Ct. decides PUERTO RICO, ET AL. v. FRANKLIN CA TAX-FREE TRUST. Decided 06/13/2016 http://liicr.nl/234Ohzr #SCOTUS
— $Cornell Law School (@CornellLaw) June 13, 2016