RT @ToddRuger: Oops: #SCOTUS order said justices would hear constitutionality of inmates spending more than 35 years on death row. Was a mistake. @CQnow
— $Oyez (@oyez) June 6, 2016
RT @chrisgeidner: UPDATED: Report on today's #SCOTUS death penalty grants — and an error at the court. https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/supreme-court-to-hear-cases-challenging-two-texas-death-sent?utm_term=.ypgOLXKaW2#.ewOXv3mNbV https://t.co/1btiUIPvYD
— $Andrew Cohen (@JustADCohen) June 6, 2016
RT @chrisgeidner: UPDATED: Report on today's #SCOTUS death penalty grants — and an error at the court. https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/supreme-court-to-hear-cases-challenging-two-texas-death-sent?utm_term=.ypgOLXKaW2#.ewOXv3mNbV https://t.co/1btiUIPvYD
— $Rick Hasen (@rickhasen) June 6, 2016
#scotus issues revised order, says it is NOT considering whether too long a wait for execution is unconstitutional. Breyer has pushed issue
— $Robert Barnes (@scotusreporter) June 6, 2016
Oops: #SCOTUS order said justices would hear constitutionality of inmates spending more than 35 years on death row. Was a mistake. @CQnow
— $Todd Ruger (@ToddRuger) June 6, 2016
RT @richardjwolf: Never Mind: #SCOTUS amends orders list, will only consider issue of intellectual disability, not time on death row https://twitter.com/richardjwolf/status/739816329025359876
— $Oyez (@oyez) June 6, 2016
UPDATED: Report on today's #SCOTUS death penalty grants — and an error at the court. https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/supreme-court-to-hear-cases-challenging-two-texas-death-sent?utm_term=.ypgOLXKaW2#.ewOXv3mNbV https://t.co/1btiUIPvYD
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 6, 2016
UPDATED REPORT ON DEATH PENALTY GRANTS AT #SCOTUS: https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/supreme-court-to-hear-cases-challenging-two-texas-death-sent?utm_term=.ypgOLXKaW2#.ewOXv3mNbV https://t.co/K5m4JUSbS7
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 6, 2016
RT @richardjwolf: Never Mind: #SCOTUS amends orders list, will only consider issue of intellectual disability, not time on death row https://twitter.com/richardjwolf/status/739816329025359876
— $Mark Denniston (@CourtProf) June 6, 2016
RT @brkend: Big correction from #SCOTUS: Court now says it won't consider whether it's unconstitutional to execute someone after decades on death row.
— $American Bar (@ABAesq) June 6, 2016
RT @Paradox13VA: #SCOTUS to hear second #Virginia #redistricting case - http://bit.ly/1UmdYoT This is a potentially big deal for #Loudoun
— $Thomas Soldan (@VACriminalAtty) June 6, 2016
Never Mind: #SCOTUS amends orders list, will only consider issue of intellectual disability, not time on death row https://twitter.com/richardjwolf/status/739816329025359876
— $Richard Wolf (@richardjwolf) June 6, 2016
RT @chrisgeidner: CORRECTED ORDERS LIST: #SCOTUS ONLY granted Question 1 in Moore, not the Lackey claim about execution delays. https://t.co/14osES507b
— $Irin Carmon (@irin) June 6, 2016
CORRECTED ORDERS LIST: #SCOTUS ONLY granted Question 1 in Moore, not the Lackey claim about execution delays. https://t.co/14osES507b
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 6, 2016
RT @brkend: Big correction from #SCOTUS: Court now says it won't consider whether it's unconstitutional to execute someone after decades on death row.
— $Mike Sacks (@MikeSacksEsq) June 6, 2016
RT @brkend: Big correction from #SCOTUS: Court now says it won't consider whether it's unconstitutional to execute someone after decades on death row.
— $Irin Carmon (@irin) June 6, 2016
Big correction from #SCOTUS: Court now says it won't consider whether it's unconstitutional to execute someone after decades on death row.
— $Brent Kendall (@brkend) June 6, 2016
RT @WTOP: #SCOTUS declines to revive defamation lawsuits involving the suicide of Boston's singer http://bit.ly/1Um8LgU https://t.co/pfwKdhoTPT
— $Alan Sackrin (@AlanSackrin) June 6, 2016
#scotus #CWA https://twitter.com/circleofblue/status/739842029635686401
— $Ross A. Hammersley (@rhammer) June 6, 2016
#SCOTUS declines to revive defamation lawsuits involving the suicide of Boston's singer http://bit.ly/1Um8LgU https://t.co/pfwKdhoTPT
— $WTOP (@WTOP) June 6, 2016
Signs point to Thomas as likely author in #scotus Puerto Rico case. Probably not PR's first choice. http://bloom.bg/1Xxes2w via @bpolitics
— $Greg Stohr (@GregStohr) June 6, 2016
TODAY AT #SCOTUS: https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/supreme-court-to-hear-cases-challenging-two-texas-death-sent?utm_term=.mx4lvPg0yX#.uk1p7Zr2Xk https://t.co/rG3S89xfAP
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 6, 2016
Here's my updated story on today's big #SCOTUS cert grants regarding the death penalty: https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/supreme-court-to-hear-cases-challenging-two-texas-death-sent?utm_term=.mx4lvPg0yX#.uk1p7Zr2Xk
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 6, 2016
RT @xeronius: Like, you would be hard pressed to find a news site that does better/more thoughtful coverage of SCOTUS than @BuzzFeed's @chrisgeidner.
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 6, 2016
The latest Law Offices of Tim Powers! http://paper.li/TimPowersLaw/1393017439?edition_id=c1863cf0-2bf9-11e6-87b9-0cc47a0d164b Thanks to @WSJLawBlog #dday #scotus
— $Timothy Edward Powers (@TimPowersLaw) June 6, 2016
#SCOTUS to hear second #Virginia #redistricting case - http://bit.ly/1UmdYoT This is a potentially big deal for #Loudoun
— $Evan Macbeth (@Paradox13VA) June 6, 2016
Faces of DAPA and DACA+ reminds us that #SCOTUS case is about more than law. It's about lives #FightForFamilies https://t.co/HlZ2FvUUS7
— $Nat'l Imm Law Center (@NILC_org) June 6, 2016
I talked to @AmyHM about the #SCOTUS abortion case + great segments from @anamariecox @dstfelix @JulianneRoss + MORE https://twitter.com/MTVPolitics/status/738903417205198848
— $Julie Zeilinger (@juliezeilinger) June 6, 2016
Like, you would be hard pressed to find a news site that does better/more thoughtful coverage of SCOTUS than @BuzzFeed's @chrisgeidner.
— $AlsoKnownAsABuster (@xeronius) June 6, 2016
RT @ReutersLegal: #SCOTUS to consider Texas death row inmate's appeal http://reut.rs/2134qUu
— $Mark Denniston (@CourtProf) June 6, 2016
RT @csmcdaniel: SCOTUS agreed to hear two death penalty cases next term. Here are the questions they raise: https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/supreme-court-to-hear-cases-challenging-two-texas-death-sent?utm_term=.htwY2lZdBq#.gePv67wOo2 https://t.co/jYkVGGeCgk
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 6, 2016
SCOTUS has not recognized a category of unprotected speech that would subsume revenge porn.
— $Mark W. Bennett (@MarkWBennett) June 6, 2016
#SCOTUS to consider Texas death row inmate's appeal http://reut.rs/2134qUu
— $Reuters Legal (@ReutersLegal) June 6, 2016
SCOTUS agreed to hear two death penalty cases next term. Here are the questions they raise: https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/supreme-court-to-hear-cases-challenging-two-texas-death-sent?utm_term=.htwY2lZdBq#.gePv67wOo2 https://t.co/jYkVGGeCgk
— $Chris McDaniel (@csmcdaniel) June 6, 2016
SCOTUS has never signed off on privacy torts; if it had, whether 1A bars criminal but not civil liability = q. https://twitter.com/paxdickinson/status/739826425381916673
— $Mark W. Bennett (@MarkWBennett) June 6, 2016
I broke it first. Now read it on Scotusblog, read Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz https://shar.es/1JWlpi #SCotUS #Bankruptcy
— $M. Hedayat and Associates, P.C. (@mhalaw) June 6, 2016
SCOTUS to review districting plan 4 Va. House of Del. Challengers:gives too little power to Black voters,boosts GOP http://apne.ws/1TRD4wr
— $Laffy (@GottaLaff) June 6, 2016
RT @JamesFallows: Obvious extension of Trump identity-based recusal plan: Wouldn’t all 5 Catholic SCOTUS members need to step aside from all abortion cases?
— $Timothy Noah (@TimothyNoah1) June 6, 2016
RT @GregStohr: More #scotus opinions coming Thursday, court says.
— $Oyez (@oyez) June 6, 2016
Supreme Ct. decides ROSS, MICHAEL v. BLAKE, SHAIDON. Decided 06/06/2016 http://liicr.nl/1PA8Q4h #SCOTUS
— $Cornell Legal Information Institute (@LIICornell) June 6, 2016