#SCOTUS conference Thursday includes whether Texas law allows for warrantless blood draw for third DWI. State courts have said get a warrant
— $Chuck Lindell (@chucklindell) June 7, 2016
But I'm taking the unprecedented step of holding up a SCOTUS nomination in the hopes Trump can pick a Justice! https://twitter.com/BuzzFeedPol/status/740297063284412417
— $Jonathan Singer (@jonathanhsinger) June 7, 2016
The ultimate trolling---what if a President Hillary nominated Judge Curiel to SCOTUS in early '17.
— $Luke Russert (@LukeRussert) June 7, 2016
SCOTUS will hear the case of a Texas man sentenced to die because he's black. Our earlier editorial: http://nyti.ms/1VKR5Rc
— $NYT Opinion (@nytopinion) June 7, 2016
RT @UCILaw: Both Dean Chemerinsky & Prof. @rickhasen quoted @MotherJones re: Justice Alito now the most conservative on #SCOTUS http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/06/samuel-alito-profile-antonin-scalia-supreme-court-appointment
— $Rick Hasen (@rickhasen) June 7, 2016
SCOTUS declines to weigh in on IL case alleging Target store knowingly sold ‘useless and risky’ drug http://bit.ly/1TU2Srz @amaloney24
— $Daily Law Bulletin (@CDLB) June 7, 2016
Both Dean Chemerinsky & Prof. @rickhasen quoted @MotherJones re: Justice Alito now the most conservative on #SCOTUS http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/06/samuel-alito-profile-antonin-scalia-supreme-court-appointment
— $University of California, Irvine School of Law (@UCILaw) June 7, 2016
RT @chrisgeidner: First of the pending federal court #trans cases will be headed to #SCOTUS this summer: https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/virginia-school-board-to-ask-supreme-court-to-review-trans-s?utm_term=.ue3MPBK2wg#.aa3aGdqWxg https://t.co/OksBW4A5IL
— $Michelle Olsen (@AppellateDaily) June 7, 2016
I find it strange that @OrrinHatch, of all Repubs, has become such an outspoken Trump apologist. All about SCOTUS? https://twitter.com/hunterschwarz/status/740256761077174272
— $McKay Coppins (@mckaycoppins) June 7, 2016
Seth Kreimer examines the response after the #SCOTUS Obergefell ruling: @abajournal http://bit.ly/1OKTcxo https://t.co/axYMWkqZJF
— $University of Pennsylvania Law School (@PennLaw) June 7, 2016
TPM: No reason to be worried about Trump's SCOTUS picks as president, says Senate Judiciary Chair … https://t.co/kzadSVuNp2
— $Ali Ebrahimzadeh, Esq. (@PrometheusLaw) June 7, 2016
No reason to be worried about Trump's SCOTUS picks as president, says Senate Judiciary Chair http://bit.ly/1RWhAw4 https://t.co/aPs0kr1XoA
— $Talking Points Memo (@TPM) June 7, 2016
First of the pending federal court #trans cases will be headed to #SCOTUS this summer: https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/virginia-school-board-to-ask-supreme-court-to-review-trans-s?utm_term=.ue3MPBK2wg#.aa3aGdqWxg https://t.co/OksBW4A5IL
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 7, 2016
#SCOTUS: Dismissal of Claim Under #FTCA “Exceptions” Does Not Bar Second Suit http://ow.ly/cfAO3010WWn @SPB_Global #Litigation
— $Jennifer Schaller (@natlawreview) June 7, 2016
RT @jessewegman: #SCOTUS takes up case of Duane Buck, sentenced to die after his own expert said he’s more dangerous b/c he’s black. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/03/opinion/sunday/race-and-the-death-penalty-in-texas.html
— $Robin Frazer Clark (@robinfclark) June 7, 2016
RT @Scotus: Sotomayor’s View of Judging Is on the Record http://nyti.ms/1Xq7wUM
— $Frank Mascagni III (@Frankmascagniii) June 7, 2016
RT @JoshDorner: Roll Call: Ayotte needs support of anti-Trump indy women to win. Reminder: Ayotte + Trump both want SCOTUS justices who will overturn Roe.
— $Joan Walsh (@joanwalsh) June 7, 2016
RT @poniewozik: @michaelscherer It's coherent. You just have to add the silent "but it's better than Hillary naming SCOTUS/not signing my bills" every time
— $michaelscherer (@michaelscherer) June 7, 2016
@michaelscherer It's coherent. You just have to add the silent "but it's better than Hillary naming SCOTUS/not signing my bills" every time
— $James Poniewozik (@poniewozik) June 7, 2016
Roll Call: Ayotte needs support of anti-Trump indy women to win. Reminder: Ayotte + Trump both want SCOTUS justices who will overturn Roe.
— $Josh Dorner (@JoshDorner) June 7, 2016
RT @jesseclee44: There is a universally-respected SCOTUS nominee being blocked b/c Senate GOP wants the seat filled by a person the Speaker calls a "racist."
— $Steve Singiser (@stevesingiser) June 7, 2016
#OTD in 1965, #SCOTUS ruled in the first major reproductive rights case, Griswold v. Connecticut: http://bit.ly/1YcRdtl
— $Oyez (@oyez) June 7, 2016
#SeventhCircuit Invalidates #ClassAction Waivers and Sets Stage for Supreme Court Battle http://ow.ly/5I30300YBbK #SCOTUS
— $Jennifer Schaller (@natlawreview) June 7, 2016
Sotomayor’s View of Judging Is on the Record http://nyti.ms/1Xq7wUM
— $Scotus (@Scotus) June 7, 2016
RT @jessewegman: #SCOTUS takes up case of Duane Buck, sentenced to die after his own expert said he’s more dangerous b/c he’s black. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/03/opinion/sunday/race-and-the-death-penalty-in-texas.html
— $NYT Opinion (@nytopinion) June 7, 2016
NEW from PolitiFact PA, @billy_penn: Pat Toomey’s beef with SCOTUS pick Merrick Garland for freeing ‘extremists' http://www.politifact.com/pennsylvania/statements/2016/jun/07/pat-toomey/pat-toomeys-beef-supreme-court-pick-merrick-garlan/
— $PolitiFact (@PolitiFact) June 7, 2016
Professor Michael Graetz and Linda Greenhouse co-write new book on #BurgerCourt and judicial right. #Scotus. http://ow.ly/1kpb3010KXI
— $Columbia Law School (@ColumbiaLaw) June 7, 2016
Good to hear @KellyAyotte, @SenDanCoats, @SenJohnMcCain but will they still vote for Trump AND hold SCOTUS vacancy open for him to fill?!
— $igorvolsky (@igorvolsky) June 7, 2016
RT @CAPgunsandcrime: Despite what they say publicly about Trump, Republicans STILL want him to pick next SCOTUS justice #DoYourJob https://t.co/zKGTkA4zi9
— $Josh Dorner (@JoshDorner) June 7, 2016
Despite what they say publicly about Trump, Republicans STILL want him to pick next SCOTUS justice #DoYourJob https://t.co/zKGTkA4zi9
— $CAP Action Guns (@CAPActionGuns) June 7, 2016
RT @nycsouthpaw: I really don't understand why you'd hold an extra SCOTUS seat to be filled by someone you identify as openly racist *about judges.*
— $Josh Dorner (@JoshDorner) June 7, 2016
RT @SLandP: Is SCOTUS essentially telling Alabama its capital punishment process in unconstitutional through Hurst GVRs? http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2016/06/is-scotus-essentially-telling-alabama-its-capital-punishment-process-in-unconstitutional-through-hur.html
— $Michelle Olsen (@AppellateDaily) June 7, 2016
Fun @MarciaCoyle piece on #SCOTUS amicus brief @JennerBlockLLP & I filed in Akbar case re: military death penalty: http://www.nationallawjournal.com/supremecourtbriefhome/id=1202759382570?__nored=2
— $Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) June 7, 2016
RT @JessBravin: Death & Texas: Any problem if expert witness tells jury blacks are more likely to be dangerous? #SCOTUS, next term http://j.mp/25Jrjj1
— $Michelle Olsen (@AppellateDaily) June 7, 2016
I really don't understand why you'd hold an extra SCOTUS seat to be filled by someone you identify as openly racist *about judges.*
— $southpaw (@nycsouthpaw) June 7, 2016
Is SCOTUS essentially telling Alabama its capital punishment process in unconstitutional through Hurst GVRs? http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2016/06/is-scotus-essentially-telling-alabama-its-capital-punishment-process-in-unconstitutional-through-hur.html
— $Douglas A. Berman (@SLandP) June 7, 2016
#SCOTUS takes up case of Duane Buck, sentenced to die after his own expert said he’s more dangerous b/c he’s black. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/03/opinion/sunday/race-and-the-death-penalty-in-texas.html
— $Jesse Wegman (@jessewegman) June 7, 2016
RT @jesseclee44: There is a universally-respected SCOTUS nominee being blocked b/c Senate GOP wants the seat filled by a person the Speaker calls a "racist."
— $Josh Dorner (@JoshDorner) June 7, 2016
RT @RI4A: RT @FWD_us: Unfreezing #DAPA & #DACA+ will boost our economy + create jobs. #immigration #UnfreezeDAPA #SCOTUS https://t.co/Oe8D336wq5
— $Nancy Vizer (@NancyMVizerPC) June 7, 2016
DC Circuit kept us waiting for an hour before announcing: no rulings today. Must be taking PR tips from SCOTUS.
— $Lawrence Hurley (@lawrencehurley) June 7, 2016