Legal Birds Matching "SCOTUS"
Tweets matching "SCOTUS"
RT @SCOTUSblog: SCOTUS holds 5-3 that judge was required to recuse from case in which he participated in some significant fashion as district attorney.
— $Columbus Bar (@ColumbusBar) June 9, 2016
Sort of like the idea that SCOTUS is in a work-stoppage to protest the hiring freeze only they're being a little too subtle about it
— $Tim Murphy (@timothypmurphy) June 9, 2016
No #WholeWomansHealth #abortion ruling today at #scotus
— $Jennifer Haberkorn (@jenhab) June 9, 2016
RT @SCOTUSblog: SCOTUS holds 5-3 that judge was required to recuse from case in which he participated in some significant fashion as district attorney.
— $Oyez (@oyez) June 9, 2016
No #SCOTUS decisions on abortion access, immigration, or affirmative action today. See you on Monday!
— $Josh Dorner (@JoshDorner) June 9, 2016
RT @GregStohr: No #scotus blockbusters today. Tune in Monday, which is next chance for affirmative action, abortion, immigration, Puerto Rico debt, etc.
— $Oyez (@oyez) June 9, 2016
SCOTUS holds 5-3 that judge was required to recuse from case in which he participated in some significant fashion as district attorney.
— $SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 9, 2016
SCOTUS holds that state justice had to recuse in a death penalty case where he was the district attorney. Remarkably, there are 3 dissents.
— $Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser) June 9, 2016
RT @GregStohr: No #scotus blockbusters today. Tune in Monday, which is next chance for affirmative action, abortion, immigration, Puerto Rico debt, etc.
— $Mike Sacks (@MikeSacksEsq) June 9, 2016
RT @joshgerstein: 1st #SCOTUS decision this AM held, roughly 6-2, that Puerto Rico and US are same sovereign for double jeopardy purposes
— $Russ Walker (@russ_walker) June 9, 2016
RT @GregStohr: No #scotus blockbusters today. Tune in Monday, which is next chance for affirmative action, abortion, immigration, Puerto Rico debt, etc.
— $Anne Cronin (@annecronin) June 9, 2016
RT @PatrickGregry: Justice Kennedy has the opinion for a 5-3 #SCOTUS in No 15-5040 Williams v. Pennsylvania. Penn Supreme Court is vacated and remanded
— $Oyez (@oyez) June 9, 2016
No #scotus blockbusters today. Tune in Monday, which is next chance for affirmative action, abortion, immigration, Puerto Rico debt, etc.
— $Greg Stohr (@GregStohr) June 9, 2016
Justice Kennedy has the opinion for a 5-3 #SCOTUS in No 15-5040 Williams v. Pennsylvania. Penn Supreme Court is vacated and remanded
— $Patrick Gregory (@PatrickGregry) June 9, 2016
None of the major decisions at SCOTUS today, per @joshgerstein. STAND DOWN EVERYONE
— $Seung Min Kim (@seungminkim) June 9, 2016
Final #SCOTUS opinion today on death penalty and a PA judge's recusal. No immigration, affirmative action, abortion decisions today. @CQnow
— $Todd Ruger (@ToddRuger) June 9, 2016
RT @PaulaReidCBS: "Free Brady!" Most commonly shouted phrase by tourists passing by our camera at SCOTUS.
— $Zoe Tillman (@ZoeTillman) June 9, 2016
1st #SCOTUS decision this AM held, roughly 6-2, that Puerto Rico and US are same sovereign for double jeopardy purposes
— $Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein) June 9, 2016
"Free Brady!" Most commonly shouted phrase by tourists passing by our camera at SCOTUS.
— $Paula Reid (@PaulaReidCBS) June 9, 2016
RT @SCOTUSblog: SCOTUS holds 6-2 that a judge can recall a dismissed jury in a civil case if there is an error in the verdict
— $Oyez (@oyez) June 9, 2016
SCOTUS holds 6-2 that a judge can recall a dismissed jury in a civil case if there is an error in the verdict
— $SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 9, 2016
2nd #SCOTUS opn this AM Sotomayor 6-2 judge has power to recall discharged jury in civil case. Dietz v Bouldin. #moretocome
— $Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein) June 9, 2016
RT @ToddRuger: Second #SCOTUS case: Rules on when a federal judge can recall a jury in a civil case. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-458_b07d.pdf @CQnow
— $Irin Carmon (@irin) June 9, 2016
Here is the #SCOTUS decision in Dietz: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-458_b07d.pdf
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 9, 2016
RT @SCOTUSblog: SCOTUS holds 6-2 that Puerto Rico and US cannot bring successive prosecutions for same conduct under equivalent criminal laws
— $Oyez (@oyez) June 9, 2016
Second #SCOTUS case: Rules on when a federal judge can recall a jury in a civil case. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-458_b07d.pdf @CQnow
— $Todd Ruger (@ToddRuger) June 9, 2016
Second decision is in Dietz v. Bouldin, by Sotomayor. Ninth Circuit affirmed. Thomas, joined by Kennedy, dissent. #SCOTUS
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 9, 2016
Here is the 6-2 decision in Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-108_k4mp.pdf #SCOTUS
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 9, 2016
RT @imillhiser: SCOTUS just struck a blow to Puerto Rican sovereignty, although the most important question is how SCOTUS will deal with their debt.
— $Irin Carmon (@irin) June 9, 2016
SCOTUS just struck a blow to Puerto Rican sovereignty, although the most important question is how SCOTUS will deal with their debt.
— $Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser) June 9, 2016
P.R. Supreme Ct said not distinct from fed govt, and territory couldn’t bring charges against def who plead guilty in federal court #SCOTUS
— $Patrick Gregory (@PatrickGregry) June 9, 2016
RT @SCOTUSblog: SCOTUS holds 6-2 that Puerto Rico and US cannot bring successive prosecutions for same conduct under equivalent criminal laws
— $Cleveland-Marshall College of Law (@CMLawLibrary) June 9, 2016
Ginsburg, joined by Thomas, concurs. Thomas concurs in part and in judgment. Breyer, joined by Sotomayor, dissents. #SCOTUS
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 9, 2016
RT @shermancourt: Kagan opinion in PR double jeopardy case confirms that Alito lost #scotus majority in Friedrichs with Scalia's death. No Alito maj in Jan.
— $Rick Hasen (@rickhasen) June 9, 2016
Kagan opinion in PR double jeopardy case confirms that Alito lost #scotus majority in Friedrichs with Scalia's death. No Alito maj in Jan.
— $Mark Sherman (@shermancourt) June 9, 2016
First #SCOTUS ruling today: double jeopardy clause bars Puerto Rico and U.S. from successively prosecuting a single person. @CQnow
— $Todd Ruger (@ToddRuger) June 9, 2016
SCOTUS holds 6-2 that Puerto Rico and US cannot bring successive prosecutions for same conduct under equivalent criminal laws
— $SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 9, 2016
Four boxes! Which one will get the rose? Who will be saved? Whose lives will be destroyed today? Tune in to SCOTUS at 10am.
— $U N Owen (@gideonstrumpet) June 9, 2016
Woo! We have the less interesting of the two Puerto Rico decisions from SCOTUS!
— $Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser) June 9, 2016
RT @PatrickGregry: 1st #SCOTUS opinion in No 15-108 Puerto Rico v Valle: Is Puerto Rico distinct from federal govt for purposes of double jeopardy?
— $Irin Carmon (@irin) June 9, 2016