Legal Birds Matching "SCOTUS"
Tweets matching "SCOTUS"
Judges Must Recuse in Cases They Once Prosecuted #SCOTUS rules http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2016/06/09/judges-must-recuse-in-cases-they-once-prosecuted-supreme-court-rules/#ixzz4B5w2ZaGs https://t.co/MyYiSCzbWJ
— $National Law Journal (@TheNLJ) June 9, 2016
Judges Must Recuse in Cases They Once Prosecuted #SCOTUS rules http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2016/06/09/judges-must-recuse-in-cases-they-once-prosecuted-supreme-court-rules/#ixzz4B5w2ZaGs https://t.co/4DOqijtKwO
— $Texas Lawyer (@TexasLawyer) June 9, 2016
Judges Must Recuse in Cases They Once Prosecuted #SCOTUS rules http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2016/06/09/judges-must-recuse-in-cases-they-once-prosecuted-supreme-court-rules/#ixzz4B5w2ZaGs https://t.co/mY6Z0eSZfx
— $NJ Law Journal (@NJLJ) June 9, 2016
Judges Must Recuse in Cases They Once Prosecuted #SCOTUS rules http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2016/06/09/judges-must-recuse-in-cases-they-once-prosecuted-supreme-court-rules/#ixzz4B5w2ZaGs https://t.co/8SnHl4fK0n
— $Legal Times (@Legal_Times) June 9, 2016
Judges Must Recuse in Cases They Once Prosecuted #SCOTUS rules http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2016/06/09/judges-must-recuse-in-cases-they-once-prosecuted-supreme-court-rules/#ixzz4B5w2ZaGs https://t.co/e9sBS4wqui
— $The American Lawyer (@AmericanLawyer) June 9, 2016
Third Circuit issues mandate in NFL concussion settlement appeal. Only avenue left for objectors is SCOTUS & stay: https://t.co/nuIbUy3R5R
— $Daniel Wallach (@WALLACHLEGAL) June 9, 2016
Dietz v Bouldin #scotus says federal court may recall a jury in a civil case for more deliberations. How would you like to be on that jury?
— $Adam E. Carr (@carrlawohio) June 9, 2016
Today's SCOTUS decision in Dietz v. Bouldin is its first to reference Twitter. https://t.co/D0jHiLacCt
— $Proloy K. Das (@Proloy) June 9, 2016
#scotus says federal district court may recall a jury in a civil case for further deliberations to correct an error in the jury’s verdict.
— $Adam E. Carr (@carrlawohio) June 9, 2016
RT @SCOTUSblog: SCOTUS holds 5-3 that judge was required to recuse from case in which he participated in some significant fashion as district attorney.
— $Bradley Lamar Henry (@BradHenryJD) June 9, 2016
RT @cspan: "I suspect it went something like this…" @AlFranken imagines how an 1801 Senate #SCOTUS debate would have sounded. https://amp.twimg.com/v/41df10cc-1209-4d23-8481-abdc031ced6d
— $Mike Sacks (@MikeSacksEsq) June 9, 2016
RT @KimberlyRobinsn: #SCOTUS will hear 15-8049 Buck v Stephens re: expert who said Def more likely to be dangerous b/c black https://t.co/aM7X3ThUlX
— $Ann Althouse (@annalthouse) June 9, 2016
"I suspect it went something like this…" @AlFranken imagines how an 1801 Senate #SCOTUS debate would have sounded. https://amp.twimg.com/v/41df10cc-1209-4d23-8481-abdc031ced6d
— $CSPAN (@cspan) June 9, 2016
RT @brkend: Big correction from #SCOTUS: Court now says it won't consider whether it's unconstitutional to execute someone after decades on death row.
— $Ann Althouse (@annalthouse) June 9, 2016
RT @timothypmurphy: Sort of like the idea that SCOTUS is in a work-stoppage to protest the hiring freeze only they're being a little too subtle about it
— $Libby Nelson (@libbyanelson) June 9, 2016
#SCOTUS says judge should have stepped aside in #deathpenalty case http://reut.rs/21aaOcH https://t.co/mAP01T59E3
— $Reuters Legal (@ReutersLegal) June 9, 2016
#ff @dominicholden who is outside #SCOTUS regarding Ken Paxton's new lawsuit. (I'm inside, writing about Williams.)
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 9, 2016
Supreme Ct. decides PUERTO RICO v. VALLE, LUIS M., ET AL.. Decided 06/09/2016 http://liicr.nl/22VDsQ9 #SCOTUS
— $Cornell Legal Information Institute (@LIICornell) June 9, 2016
Supreme Ct. decides DIETZ, ROCKY v. BOULDIN, HILLARY. Decided 06/09/2016 http://liicr.nl/22VDwj0 #SCOTUS
— $Cornell Legal Information Institute (@LIICornell) June 9, 2016
Supreme Ct. decides WILLIAMS, TERRANCE v. PENNSYLVANIA. Decided 06/09/2016 http://liicr.nl/22VDxn4 #SCOTUS
— $Cornell Legal Information Institute (@LIICornell) June 9, 2016
RT @steve_vladeck: So if you're scoring at home (or even if you're by yourself), there are 19 #SCOTUS decisions left, and three "official" non-argument days.
— $Oyez (@oyez) June 9, 2016
SCOTUS says former prosecutor can't be judge in capital case he prosecuted; Roberts, Alito & Thomas see no problem http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-5040_6537.pdf
— $David Fathi (@DavidCFathi) June 9, 2016
RT @PatrickGregry: P.R. Supreme Ct said not distinct from fed govt, and territory couldn’t bring charges against def who plead guilty in federal court #SCOTUS
— $Robert Thomas (@invcondemnation) June 9, 2016
That this case had to go to SCOTUS is only aspect that's shocking. PA Sup Ct, what the fuck is wrong with you? https://twitter.com/cristianafarias/status/740911003672666112
— $Scott Greenfield (@ScottGreenfield) June 9, 2016
RT @joshgerstein: 1st #SCOTUS decision this AM held, roughly 6-2, that Puerto Rico and US are same sovereign for double jeopardy purposes
— $Robert Thomas (@invcondemnation) June 9, 2016
In contrast, #SCOTUS did opine today on what constitutes ACTUAL judicial bias: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-5040_6537.pdf
— $Mike Sacks (@MikeSacksEsq) June 9, 2016
RT @SCOTUSblog: SCOTUS holds 6-2 that Puerto Rico and US cannot bring successive prosecutions for same conduct under equivalent criminal laws
— $Robert Thomas (@invcondemnation) June 9, 2016
That is the final decision of the day. Next day: #SCOTUS orders and opinions expected on Monday morning.
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 9, 2016
Here is the #SCOTUS decision in Williams: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-5040_6537.pdf
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 9, 2016
Dear @realDonaldTrump: For future reference, _this_ is what #SCOTUS says inappropriate judicial bias looks like: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-5040_6537.pdf
— $Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) June 9, 2016
RT @jenhab: No #WholeWomansHealth #abortion ruling today at #scotus
— $POLITICO Pro (@POLITICOPro) June 9, 2016
RT @cristianafarias: #SCOTUS holds an elected chief justice's failure to recuse in capital case violated defendant's due process rights. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-5040_6537.pdf
— $Irin Carmon (@irin) June 9, 2016
#SCOTUS holds an elected chief justice's failure to recuse in capital case violated defendant's due process rights. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-5040_6537.pdf
— $Cristian Farías ???? (@cristianafarias) June 9, 2016
#SCOTUS ruling vacates PA Supr Ct decision, which had itself reversed a lower court decision ordering resentencing for Terrance Williams.
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 9, 2016
#scotus rules that Pa Sup Ct justice should have recused from death penalty case. here's previous story http://wpo.st/KJUe1
— $Robert Barnes (@scotusreporter) June 9, 2016
So if you're scoring at home (or even if you're by yourself), there are 19 #SCOTUS decisions left, and three "official" non-argument days.
— $Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) June 9, 2016
RT @ToddRuger: Final #SCOTUS opinion today on death penalty and a PA judge's recusal. No immigration, affirmative action, abortion decisions today. @CQnow
— $American Bar (@ABAesq) June 9, 2016
#SCOTUS holds that a judge, under Due Process Clause, must recuse when that person had a signif, personal role in a critical trial decision.
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 9, 2016
Third and FINAL #SCOTUS case today PA chief justice should have recused in death penalty case where he had role in declaring it a death case
— $Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein) June 9, 2016
RT @timothypmurphy: Sort of like the idea that SCOTUS is in a work-stoppage to protest the hiring freeze only they're being a little too subtle about it
— $Molly Redden (@mtredden) June 9, 2016