Legal Birds Matching "SCOTUS"
Tweets matching "SCOTUS"
Constitutionally Speaking, What is Puerto Rico?: by Michael Dorf Yesterday's SCOTUS ruling… http://goo.gl/fb/5pt8g0
— $Dorf on Law (@dorfonlaw) June 10, 2016
"Stop and Frisk" established 48 years ago today in the landmark #SCOTUS case, Terry v. Ohio http://shout.lt/bDpTf https://t.co/mJl2KMOu7V
— $LexisNexis (@LexisNexis) June 10, 2016
Enjoyed visiting my nephew's 1st grade class for "Bagels & Biographies" yesterday. He had Justice Marshall. #SCOTUS https://t.co/f55J6tQRpZ
— $Michelle Olsen (@AppellateDaily) June 10, 2016
RT @goldietaylor: I'm sorry if pointing out the real possibility of Trump selecting at least two SCOTUS nominees is offensive to you. #WellNoNotReally
— $Greg Dworkin (@DemFromCT) June 10, 2016
I'm sorry if pointing out the real possibility of Trump selecting at least two SCOTUS nominees is offensive to you. #WellNoNotReally
— $G O L D I E. (@goldietaylor) June 10, 2016
RT @smmarotta: "If not, not" is a unique Kaganism. Used three times by her. Before that only J. Bradley in 1889. #SCOTUS #legalwriting
— $Michelle Olsen (@AppellateDaily) June 10, 2016
RT @cristianafarias: Of course: The Puerto Rico governor is not happy with today's #SCOTUS ruling—calls it "contradictory" and "wrong." https://t.co/LWzk4jRLm9
— $Michelle Olsen (@AppellateDaily) June 10, 2016
RT @SCOTUSPlaces: Here's Belva Lockwood, first woman to run for President (1884) and to argue in #SCOTUS (1880). https://t.co/Nfuchbaqs2
— $Mike Sacks (@MikeSacksEsq) June 9, 2016
Here's Belva Lockwood, first woman to run for President (1884) and to argue in #SCOTUS (1880). https://t.co/Nfuchbaqs2
— $Supreme Court Places (@SCOTUSPlaces) June 9, 2016
RT @Sifill_LDF: Remember when the #SCOTUS decided we didn't need the protections of Sec 5 of the VRA anymore? http://www.naacpldf.org/files/publications/Democracy%20Diminished-State%20and%20Local%20Voting%20Changes%20Post-Shelby%20v.%20Holder_0.pdf
— $Irin Carmon (@irin) June 9, 2016
Remember when the #SCOTUS decided we didn't need the protections of Sec 5 of the VRA anymore? http://www.naacpldf.org/files/publications/Democracy%20Diminished-State%20and%20Local%20Voting%20Changes%20Post-Shelby%20v.%20Holder_0.pdf
— $Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sifill_LDF) June 9, 2016
RT @Tonymauro: Major #scotus ruling on judicial recusals is 'completely wrong,' former PA Justice Castille says http://at.law.com/uE1pq8?cmp=share_twitter via @lawdotcom
— $Jason Dunkle (@jdlawpsu) June 9, 2016
RT @ProfDavidCruz: Important 2nd Am ruling by 11 9th Circuit judges. Still only 8 members at SCOTUS to consider any appeal. https://twitter.com/ZoeTillman/status/740959592969056256
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 9, 2016
atlblog: RT Tonymauro: JoshMBlackman Breyer owns up to $100k in Lowe's Companies Inc. stock, per his latest financial disclosure. #scotus
— $Ali Ebrahimzadeh, Esq. (@PrometheusLaw) June 9, 2016
atlblog: RT JoshMBlackman: Justice Breyer recuses in BROWN, GEORGE W. V. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS. Must be a Home Depot fan. #scotus Tonymauro
— $Ali Ebrahimzadeh, Esq. (@PrometheusLaw) June 9, 2016
RT @Tonymauro: @JoshMBlackman Breyer owns up to $100k in Lowe's Companies Inc. stock, per his latest financial disclosure. #scotus
— $Above the Law (@atlblog) June 9, 2016
RT @JoshMBlackman: Justice Breyer recuses in BROWN, GEORGE W. V. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS. Must be a Home Depot fan. #scotus @Tonymauro
— $Above the Law (@atlblog) June 9, 2016
“#Guns are the new abortion,” for #SCOTUS nominations writes #uclalaw Prof. @adamwinkler in @yahoo opinion piece: http://yhoo.it/25PQFvw
— $UCLA School of Law (@UCLA_Law) June 9, 2016
I almost wish I had the kind of privilege it would take to throw away SCOTUS for another generation. #WhyWeFight
— $G O L D I E. (@goldietaylor) June 9, 2016
RT @BrennanCenter: Earlier this year, fellow Dorothy Samuels wrote #SCOTUS “needs to step in” on Williams v. Penn. Today, it did. http://trib.al/TJYqF2W #TBT
— $Frank Mascagni III (@Frankmascagniii) June 9, 2016
Of course: The Puerto Rico governor is not happy with today's #SCOTUS ruling—calls it "contradictory" and "wrong." https://t.co/LWzk4jRLm9
— $Cristian Farías ???? (@cristianafarias) June 9, 2016
Be sure to hit the #SCOTUS vacancy corner tomorrow! #DoYourJob #WeNeedNine https://twitter.com/LC_ACS/status/741068755728539653
— $ACS Law and Policy (@acslaw) June 9, 2016
RT @VPLive: "I was responsible for 8 Justices and 9 total nominees to the Supreme Court. More than anyone alive." - @VP #SCOTUS https://t.co/w8rkhXjMrO
— $WH Live (NARA) (@WHLive) June 9, 2016
RT @SCOTUSnom: "The meaning and extent of our federal Constitution, our constitutional rights...all could depend on where you live." —@VP on 4-4 #SCOTUS
— $WH Live (NARA) (@WHLive) June 9, 2016
RT @VPLive: "Federal laws that apply to the whole country will be constitutional in some parts, but unconstitutional in others." - @VP on #SCOTUS
— $WH Live (NARA) (@WHLive) June 9, 2016
.@VP: SCOTUS standoff "will only be resolved if the pressure is unrelentingly kept up." Particularly in states where senators "know better"
— $Mike Memoli (@mikememoli) June 9, 2016
RT @SCOTUSnom: @VP on "deleterious effects" of 4-4 #SCOTUS: ?Increased cost and delay ?Delayed justice ?Different rulings in different parts of the country
— $WH Live (NARA) (@WHLive) June 9, 2016
Yup. And it probably won't do much harm in the future. The 5th Circuit will and SCOTUS won't be able to stop it. https://twitter.com/irin/status/741068149513179136
— $Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser) June 9, 2016
"The longer this high court vacancy remains unfilled, the more serious the problem will become." —@VP warns @SenateGOP on blocking Garland
— $SCOTUS Nomination (@SCOTUSnom) June 9, 2016
RT @SCOTUSnom: "The meaning and extent of our federal Constitution, our constitutional rights...all could depend on where you live." —@VP on 4-4 #SCOTUS
— $Irin Carmon (@irin) June 9, 2016
"The meaning and extent of our federal Constitution, our constitutional rights...all could depend on where you live." —@VP on 4-4 #SCOTUS
— $SCOTUS Nomination (@SCOTUSnom) June 9, 2016
We'll have another #SCOTUS term of confusion if a vote on the nominee doesn't happen this year, says @VP Biden. #ACS16 #DoYourJob
— $ACS Law and Policy (@acslaw) June 9, 2016
"Federal laws that apply to the whole country will be constitutional in some parts, but unconstitutional in others." - @VP on #SCOTUS
— $VP Biden Live (@VPLive) June 9, 2016
@VP on "deleterious effects" of 4-4 #SCOTUS: ?Increased cost and delay ?Delayed justice ?Different rulings in different parts of the country
— $SCOTUS Nomination (@SCOTUSnom) June 9, 2016
FACT: Every single nominee got an up-or-down vote under Sen. Joe Biden. Every single time. https://t.co/HlavsW89IY
— $SCOTUS Nomination (@SCOTUSnom) June 9, 2016
"I was responsible for 8 Justices and 9 total nominees to the Supreme Court. More than anyone alive." - @VP #SCOTUS https://t.co/w8rkhXjMrO
— $VP Biden Live (@VPLive) June 9, 2016
President shall--not may--SHALL nominate #SCOTUS replacement. @POTUS did his duty, says @VP. Senate should #DoYourJob.
— $ACS Law and Policy (@acslaw) June 9, 2016
RT @SCOTUSnom: "The failure of [@SenateGOP] to even hold a hearing...has its own grave, practical, and constitutional consequences." —@VP Joe Biden #SCOTUS
— $WH Live (NARA) (@WHLive) June 9, 2016
"The failure of [@SenateGOP] to even hold a hearing...has its own grave, practical, and constitutional consequences." —@VP Joe Biden #SCOTUS
— $SCOTUS Nomination (@SCOTUSnom) June 9, 2016
RT @ConstitutionCtr: "Guns will be at the forefront of the confirmation hearings." @adamwinkler @TheAtlantic #SCOTUS #2ndAmendment http://ow.ly/BPqs3013hME
— $Adam Winkler (@adamwinkler) June 9, 2016