Tweets matching "ACA"
A District Court Just Dealt a Blow to the ACA. Employers, Don’t Get Excited! http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/a-district-court-just-dealt-a-blow-to-37344/
— $JD Supra (@JDSupra) May 16, 2016
RT @rdnarang: Per @kenvogel, the Kochs set up a $10 million dark money group in '08. They weren’t pushed into politics during ACA. https://t.co/mf8Ej7CKsO
— $Kenneth P. Vogel (@kenvogel) May 16, 2016
Per @kenvogel, the Kochs set up a $10 million dark money group in '08. They weren’t pushed into politics during ACA. https://t.co/mf8Ej7CKsO
— $Rajan Narang (@rdnarang) May 16, 2016
RT @ABC: JUST IN: SCOTUS sends case of religious non-profits objecting to participation in contraceptive coverage under ACA back to lower courts.
— $Christopher D. Jones (@Joneslawyers) May 16, 2016
SCOTUS Tells Lower Courts to Craft Compromise for #ContraceptiveInsurance. #ACA http://ow.ly/mdts300fte2
— $Brooklyn Law School Law Library (@BLSLibrary) May 16, 2016
If a state has no Obamacare carriers, nothing in the ACA can compel health plans to sell. http://www.vox.com/2016/5/16/11673558/obamacare-marketplace-competition https://t.co/HmOV99ggaH
— $Sarah Kliff (@sarahkliff) May 16, 2016
New ACA rule bans anti-trans discrimination in health care! What does this mean for you? | Transgender Law Center http://bit.ly/1TVDT98
— $transadvocate (@transadvocate) May 16, 2016
RT @allegrakirkland: Facing $1.3B budget hole, reluctant GOP leaders in Okla. push to expand Medicaid under ACA http://bit.ly/1XuFGVZ https://t.co/09gQE8BJ8E
— $Talking Points Memo (@TPM) May 16, 2016
Facing $1.3B budget hole, reluctant GOP leaders in Okla. push to expand Medicaid under ACA http://bit.ly/1XuFGVZ https://t.co/09gQE8BJ8E
— $Allegra Kirkland (@allegrakirkland) May 16, 2016
#House of Representatives v. Burwell: Another Blow to #Obamacare http://ow.ly/pmbV300fhWK @FoleyandLardner #ACA #Litigation
— $Jennifer Schaller (@natlawreview) May 16, 2016
RT @billmon1: Even 41% of REPUBLICANS & leaners told Gallup they'd support replacing the ACA with single payer. http://www.gallup.com/poll/191504/majority-support-idea-fed-funded-healthcare-system.aspx?g_source=Politics&g_medium=newsfeed&g_campaign=tiles
— $Greg Dworkin (@DemFromCT) May 16, 2016
RT @billmon1: "Only 22% of Americans say they want ACA repealed & do not favor replacing it with a federally funded system." http://www.gallup.com/poll/191504/majority-support-idea-fed-funded-healthcare-system.aspx?g_source=Politics&g_medium=newsfeed&g_campaign=tiles
— $Greg Dworkin (@DemFromCT) May 16, 2016
RT @billmon1: When those who say they could support either ACA or single payer are asked to choose: Single payer: 64% ACA: 32% http://www.gallup.com/poll/191504/majority-support-idea-fed-funded-healthcare-system.aspx?g_source=Politics&g_medium=newsfeed&g_campaign=tiles
— $Greg Dworkin (@DemFromCT) May 16, 2016
Even 41% of REPUBLICANS & leaners told Gallup they'd support replacing the ACA with single payer. http://www.gallup.com/poll/191504/majority-support-idea-fed-funded-healthcare-system.aspx?g_source=Politics&g_medium=newsfeed&g_campaign=tiles
— $Billmon (@billmon1) May 16, 2016
"Only 22% of Americans say they want ACA repealed & do not favor replacing it with a federally funded system." http://www.gallup.com/poll/191504/majority-support-idea-fed-funded-healthcare-system.aspx?g_source=Politics&g_medium=newsfeed&g_campaign=tiles
— $Billmon (@billmon1) May 16, 2016
When those who say they could support either ACA or single payer are asked to choose: Single payer: 64% ACA: 32% http://www.gallup.com/poll/191504/majority-support-idea-fed-funded-healthcare-system.aspx?g_source=Politics&g_medium=newsfeed&g_campaign=tiles
— $Billmon (@billmon1) May 16, 2016
#SCOTUS announces compromise on #Obamacare contraceptives dispute #ACA http://fw.to/AyzyQ4k
— $Lisa Mascaro (@LisaMascaro) May 16, 2016
Legal_Times: Justices Tell Lower Courts to Craft Compromise for Contraceptive Insurance http://at.law.com/m9dEqq via TheNLJ #ACA
— $Ali Ebrahimzadeh, Esq. (@PrometheusLaw) May 16, 2016
Justices Tell Lower Courts to Craft Compromise for Contraceptive Insurance http://at.law.com/m9dEqq via @TheNLJ #ACA
— $Legal Times (@Legal_Times) May 16, 2016
RT @Law360: BREAKING: High Court Punts In #ACA Birth Control Battle: https://www.law360.com/health/articles/791490
— $LexisNexis (@LexisNexis) May 16, 2016
#SCOTUS sends #ACA contraception cases back to lower courts. Details forthcoming from @TheNLJ.
— $National Law Journal (@TheNLJ) May 16, 2016
BREAKING: High Court Punts In #ACA Birth Control Battle: https://www.law360.com/health/articles/791490
— $Law360 (@Law360) May 16, 2016
ABC: JUST IN: SCOTUS sends case of religious non-profits objecting to participation in contraceptive coverage under ACA back to lower court…
— $Ali Ebrahimzadeh, Esq. (@PrometheusLaw) May 16, 2016
Correx of earlier tweet: #SCOTUS remands lower-court judgments for further proceedings on ACA contraceptive mandate http://bit.ly/23UVm4l
— $Laffy (@GottaLaff) May 16, 2016
JUST IN: SCOTUS sends case of religious non-profits objecting to participation in contraceptive coverage under ACA back to lower courts.
— $ABC News (@ABC) May 16, 2016
RT @SCOTUSblog: In Zubik v. Burwell, re ACA contraceptive mandate, Court remands lower-court judgments for further proceedings.
— $Cecile Richards (@CecileRichards) May 16, 2016
RT @SCOTUSblog: In Zubik v. Burwell, re ACA contraceptive mandate, Court remands lower-court judgments for further proceedings.
— $Federalist Society (@FedSoc) May 16, 2016
In Zubik v. Burwell, re ACA contraceptive mandate, Court remands lower-court judgments for further proceedings.
— $SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) May 16, 2016
atlblog: RT KimberlyRobinsn: #SCOTUS per curiam in No 14-1418 Zubik v Burwell re: Obama’s work-around for religious nonprofits from ACA’s “…
— $Ali Ebrahimzadeh, Esq. (@PrometheusLaw) May 16, 2016
RT @KimberlyRobinsn: #SCOTUS per curiam in No 14-1418 Zubik v Burwell re: Obama’s work-around for religious nonprofits from ACA’s “contraception mandate”
— $Above the Law (@atlblog) May 16, 2016
RT @KimberlyRobinsn: #SCOTUS per curiam in No 14-1418 Zubik v Burwell re: Obama’s work-around for religious nonprofits from ACA’s “contraception mandate”
— $Rick Hasen (@rickhasen) May 16, 2016
#SCOTUS per curiam in No 14-1418 Zubik v Burwell re: Obama’s work-around for religious nonprofits from ACA’s “contraception mandate”
— $Kimberly Robinson (@KimberlyRobinsn) May 16, 2016
.@modrnhealthcr Plan standardization and stiffer penalties would get more young invincibles enrolled #ACA
— $David Harlow (@healthblawg) May 16, 2016
Bad news #3: Insurers’ Losses Deepened on ACA Plans in 2015, also by @annawmathews in @wsj. http://www.wsj.com/articles/insurers-losses-deepened-on-aca-plans-in-2015-1463356176 4/4
— $Charles Ornstein (@charlesornstein) May 16, 2016
Doesn't ACA provide "public option" possibility if no insurers take part? https://twitter.com/annawmathews/status/732002058350530560
— $Charles Ornstein (@charlesornstein) May 15, 2016
The ACA’s shortcomings should not discourage Congress from striving to achieve the law’s stated goal. @Avik http://bit.ly/1OobtR4
— $Manhattan Institute (@ManhattanInst) May 15, 2016
Research suggests differences between plans offered through ACA and those offered by employers may be significant. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/15/sunday-review/sorry-we-dont-take-obamacare.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share
— $Pia Christensen (@AHCJ_Pia) May 15, 2016
Good @nytrosenthal piece about undercurrent of discontent about ACA. Sorry, We Don’t Take Obamacare, via @nytimes http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/15/sunday-review/sorry-we-dont-take-obamacare.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share
— $Charles Ornstein (@charlesornstein) May 15, 2016
A District Court Just Dealt a Blow to the #ACA. Employers, Don’t Get Excited! http://ow.ly/L5FW300b3ZR #Health
— $Jennifer Schaller (@natlawreview) May 14, 2016
RT @CBrennanEsq: House Financial Services Committee Sets Hearing on CFPB’s Proposed Arbitration Rule - ACA International https://lnkd.in/bN7E8S2
— $Justin B Hosie Esq. (@ConsumerFinance) May 14, 2016