With a 354-Word Order, Justices Seek Guidance in Contraceptives Case http://at.law.com/ZAKNB5 from @Tonymauro #ACA
— $Legal Times (@Legal_Times) March 29, 2016
RT @EnergyCommerce: RMs @respsandylevin & @FrankPallone on GOP attempts to undermine the #ACA & the Basic Health Plan program: https://t.co/EaxDreYkPq
— $Rep. Frank Pallone (@FrankPallone) March 29, 2016
RMs @respsandylevin & @FrankPallone on GOP attempts to undermine the #ACA & the Basic Health Plan program: https://t.co/EaxDreYkPq
— $Energy Commerce Dems (@EnergyCommerce) March 29, 2016
.@PamBondi asks Bragg about the role of navigators under the ACA. He doesn't know what she's talking about
— $Gary Fineout (@fineout) March 29, 2016
Fed health spending lower than 2009 projection with FULL add of ACA = serious inconvenient truth for anti-ACA types https://twitter.com/HarrySteinDC/status/714866010629808128
— $Gene Sperling (@genebsperling) March 29, 2016
Breaking: #SCOTUS calls for more briefing in ACA contraception mandate accommodation case: http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/032916zr_3d9g.pdf https://t.co/ELepjtz9eS
— $Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) March 29, 2016
RT @richardjwolf: Immaculate Conception: #SCOTUS asks both sides in ACA contraceptives case to address how coverage can be offered without their involvement.
— $USA TODAY Washington (@USATWashington) March 29, 2016
Immaculate Conception: #SCOTUS asks both sides in ACA contraceptives case to address how coverage can be offered without their involvement.
— $Richard Wolf (@richardjwolf) March 29, 2016
Prof. @RichardAEpstein on Zubik v Burwell: Are religious institutions subject to the ACA's contraceptive mandate? http://ow.ly/101jFF
— $New York University School of Law (@nyulaw) March 29, 2016
.@jrovner @charles_gaba Impressive! Thanks Charles for putting this out there. #ACA #HIX #uninsured
— $David Harlow (@healthblawg) March 29, 2016
@StewSays like Roberts and ACA, you never know till their seated right?
— $Luke Russert (@LukeRussert) March 29, 2016
Department of Education Announces More Debt Relief for Former Corinthian Students - http://eepurl.com/bVJeTH
— $ACA International (@ACAIntl) March 29, 2016
#WFULaw Prof. Mark Hall discusses Medicaid, the ACA and more on The Week in Health Law podcast #wfu #healthlaw https://twitter.com/nicolasterry/status/714431969740898304
— $Wake Forest University School of Law (@WFULawSchool) March 28, 2016
RT @mfcannon: President Obama and the Supreme Court have effectively replaced the #ACA with something we now call "#ObamaCare." http://onforb.es/22wgsLa
— $Cato Institute (@CatoInstitute) March 28, 2016
RT @mfcannon: The ACA's Sixth Anniversary Is A Wake, Not A Birthday Party http://bit.ly/1ZtuyaO #hcr #tlot
— $Cato Institute (@CatoInstitute) March 27, 2016
RT @commonwealthfnd: Look at the effect the major #healthinsurance reforms of the #ACA had on coverage http://buff.ly/1WNY5dM https://t.co/26gi10Jk1T
— $Greg Dworkin (@DemFromCT) March 27, 2016
Look at the effect the major #healthinsurance reforms of the #ACA had on coverage http://buff.ly/1WNY5dM https://t.co/26gi10Jk1T
— $Commonwealth Fund (@commonwealthfnd) March 27, 2016
RT @KailiJoy: The majority of my healthcare last year wasn't covered AT ALL under my pre-ACA insurance. I couldn't have afforded it otherwise.
— $Bill Harnsberger (@BillinPortland) March 27, 2016
The majority of my healthcare last year wasn't covered AT ALL under my pre-ACA insurance. I couldn't have afforded it otherwise.
— $Kaili Joy Gray (@KailiJoy) March 27, 2016
Sotomayor, responding to Roberts: "That's a falsehood." Audio [1:15:23]: http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2015/14-1418 #ACA https://t.co/48enj6nw3h
— $Michael A. Scarcella (@MikeScarcella) March 25, 2016
RT @jburns18: Want to know what doctors really think about the #ACA? The answers from @JoanneKenen may surprise you http://ln.is/healthjournalism.org/b3pZs
— $Pia Christensen (@AHCJ_Pia) March 25, 2016
Want to know what doctors really think about the #ACA? The answers from @JoanneKenen may surprise you http://ln.is/healthjournalism.org/b3pZs
— $Joe Burns (@jburns18) March 25, 2016
Latest ed. of #Health Wonk Rvw is up! All wonks & wannabes: dig into this over your next cuppa joe http://ow.ly/ZVkaT #ACA #hcldr #HWR
— $David Harlow (@healthblawg) March 25, 2016
RT @mfcannon: #ObamaCare gives members of Congress a special exemption from the #ACA. http://onforb.es/22wgsLa
— $Cato Institute (@CatoInstitute) March 25, 2016
RT @AHCJ_Pia: What doctors really think about ACA and the role their politics play http://bit.ly/1ULf4iX
— $Joanne Kenen (@JoanneKenen) March 24, 2016
RT @mfcannon: The #ACA's Sixth Anniversary Is A Wake, Not A Birthday Party http://ow.ly/ZRxfr @Forbes @CatoInstitute
— $Cato Institute (@CatoInstitute) March 24, 2016
What doctors really think about ACA and the role their politics play http://bit.ly/1ULf4iX
— $Pia Christensen (@AHCJ_Pia) March 24, 2016
Will the Supreme Court end up deadlocked on the ACA's birth control mandate? The NYT seems to think it might: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/24/us/politics/supreme-court-case-on-contraceptives-mandate-may-offer-little-closure.html
— $Boston College Law Library (@BCLawLib) March 24, 2016
RT @sangerkatz: @sarahkliff Another key to remember, Medicaid regulatory changes made it way easier to sign up. Unrelated to ACA, but similar timing.
— $Greg Dworkin (@DemFromCT) March 24, 2016
RT @larry_levitt: CBO now expects ACA marketplace enrollment to max out at 19 million, rather than 25 million. That still seems a little high to me.
— $Jennifer Haberkorn (@jenhab) March 24, 2016
@sarahkliff Another key to remember, Medicaid regulatory changes made it way easier to sign up. Unrelated to ACA, but similar timing.
— $Margot Sanger-Katz (@sangerkatz) March 24, 2016
CBO now expects ACA marketplace enrollment to max out at 19 million, rather than 25 million. That still seems a little high to me.
— $Larry Levitt (@larry_levitt) March 24, 2016
RT @larry_levitt: The ACA requires marketplace plans to provide comprehensive coverage, so a contraception-only plan is illegal. (5 of 5)
— $Josh Dorner (@JoshDorner) March 24, 2016
RT @larry_levitt: Some Supreme Court justices suggested women could get plans covering just contraceptives in the ACA marketplaces. (2 of 5)
— $Josh Dorner (@JoshDorner) March 24, 2016
The ACA requires marketplace plans to provide comprehensive coverage, so a contraception-only plan is illegal. (5 of 5)
— $Larry Levitt (@larry_levitt) March 24, 2016
Some Supreme Court justices suggested women could get plans covering just contraceptives in the ACA marketplaces. (2 of 5)
— $Larry Levitt (@larry_levitt) March 24, 2016
RT @CEAChair: CBO estimates imply that the #ACA will cut the deficit by over $3 trillion in the next two decades. https://t.co/HlDACtxmSs
— $Congressman Tim Ryan (@RepTimRyan) March 24, 2016
TPM: RT Tierney_Megan: SCOTUS has had to 6 yrs and 4 cases to learn how the ACA works. And yet... https://twitter.com/caitlinrcruz/status/713033966500978688
— $Ali Ebrahimzadeh, Esq. (@PrometheusLaw) March 24, 2016
RT @Tierney_Megan: SCOTUS has had to 6 yrs and 4 cases to learn how the ACA works. And yet... https://twitter.com/caitlinrcruz/status/713033966500978688
— $Talking Points Memo (@TPM) March 24, 2016
Alito is smart enough that I suspect him of willfully pretending not to understand how insurance works in ACA cases. https://twitter.com/Tierney_Megan/status/713034604941340672
— $Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser) March 24, 2016